The Evolution and Transformation of Legal Thinking under the Concept of “Ecological Priority”

Authors

  • Yanan Tan Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233030, China Author
  • Weibin Zhang Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233030, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/LH.9012

Keywords:

Ecological Priority, Legal Thinking, Ecological Civilization, Institutional Construction

Abstract

In the context of comprehensively advancing the socialist rule of law in the new era, the concept of “ecological priority,” a core tenet of ecological civilization, is undergoing a transformation from political advocacy to institutionalization and legalization. As a key principle driving high-quality development, ecological pri-ority has been deeply embedded into China’s legal system under the systematic guidance of Xi Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law. It has gradually become a guiding principle for legislative orientation, a normative standard for adminis-trative law enforcement, and a philosophical foundation for judicial thinking. As both a value orientation and a component of national governance logic, ecologi-cal priority has taken root in multiple dimensions of the governance process. This paper takes the concept of ecological priority as its starting point, exploring its influence on legislative, executive, and judicial thinking, and clarifying the pathways of institutional transformation. However, China’s current ecological legal system still faces challenges such as poor institutional coordination, weak enforcement capacity, and a lack of judicial specialization. Therefore, it is imper-ative to accelerate legislation in the ecological field, consolidate the legal founda-tion, strengthen the cultivation of professional judicial talent, and enhance pub-lic awareness of ecological law. Only by promoting ecological priority through legal thinking can we further institutionalize this concept and construct a mod-ern governance system where humans and nature coexist harmoniously, thus providing a solid legal foundation for building a Beautiful China.

References

[1] He, Jun. “An Analysis of the Conflict Between Local Governments’ Ecological Protection and Economic Development.” Economic and Management Review, no. 7 (2021): 45–52.

[2] Liu, Yang. “Difficulties and Countermeasures in Implementing the Principle of Ecological Priority.” Environmental Protection, no. 12 (2022): 18–23.

[3] Xie, Bin. “Practical Dilemmas in the Implementation of Environmental Rule of Law.” China Environmental News, January 15, 2023.

[4] Sun, Wei. “Structural Problems in China’s Environmental Law System and Paths to Im-provement.” Legal Forum, no. 4 (2023): 66–73.

[5] Zhang, Zhiqiang. “International Experiences and Insights on Constructing a Climate Change Legal System.” Environmental Protection, no. 3 (2023): 12–19.

[6] Chen, Wei. “Challenges and Countermeasures in the Development of Green Judicial Teams.” Judicial Studies, no. 3 (2023): 25–31.

[7] Xi, Jinping. “Speech at the National Ecological Environmental Protection Conference.” May 20, 2023.

[8] Zhao, Lin. “Legislative Prospects for a Basic Law on Ecological Civilization.” Legal Science, no. 3 (2024): 21–28.

[9] Wu, Gang. “Enhancing Public Awareness of the Legal Value of Ecological Priority.” Law and Society, no. 4 (2024): 60–65.

[10] Li, Hua. “A Study on Capacity Building in Grassroots Environmental Law Enforcement.” Legal System Construction, no. 6 (2022): 45–52.

[11] Li, Na. “Interdisciplinary Approaches in Adjudicating Environmental Cases.” Legal Studies Journal, no. 9 (2022): 27–34.

[12] Wang, Hui. “Exploring the Legal Institutionalization of Ecological Priority.” Rule of Law Forum, no. 1 (2024): 15–23.

[13] Li, Ming. “System Construction of Public Legal Education on Environmental Law.” Envi-ronmental Law Review, no. 5 (2023): 30–37.

[14] Chen, Qiang. “Building a Beautiful China through the Rule of Law.” Legal Studies, no. 1: 10–17.

[15] Wang, Lei. “Xi Jinping Thought on the Rule of Law and Ecological Civilization Construction.” Studies on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, no. 2: 18–25.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-18

How to Cite

The Evolution and Transformation of Legal Thinking under the Concept of “Ecological Priority”. (2025). Law and Humanities, 1(2), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.63313/LH.9012