Study on the Prevention and Control of Wrongful Convictions in the Application of the Plea and Penalty Leniency System

Authors

  • Xin Fang Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233030, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/LH.9024

Keywords:

System of Leniency for Pleading Guilty and Accepting Punishment, Prevention and control of wrongful convictions, Standard of proof

Abstract

As a major reform measure in the field of criminal justice in China, the system of pleading guilty and accepting punishment with leniency has effectively improved the efficiency of litigation and optimized the allocation of judicial resources by encouraging suspect and defendants to voluntarily plead guilty and accept punishment with leniency. However, in the process of institutional practice, there are hidden risks of wrongful convictions due to lax control of evidence review standards, insufficient voluntary protection for the accused, and lack of effective legal assistance from duty lawyers. Based on the theoretical exploration of the application of the leniency system for confession and punishment in the prevention and control of wrongful cases, this paper deeply analyzes the internal mechanism of wrongful cases. From the dimensions of strengthening the rigid constraints of the principle of evidence judgment, improving the voluntary review mechanism, and enhancing the substantive legal assistance effectiveness of duty lawyers, this paper proposes paths and strategies for the prevention and control of wrongful cases, aiming to balance the relationship between institutional efficiency and judicial fairness, effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of parties, and protect the bottom line of judicial fairness and justice.

References

[1] Wang Yinglong.(2019)Prevention of Wrongful, False, and Wrongful Cases of Minor Crimes under the System of leniency for confessing and accepting punishment, People's Court Daily 6th edition.

[2] Li Li. (2022) Research on the Prevention and Control of Wrongful Cases in the Application of the Leniency System for Admitting Guilty and Punishing, Journal of Shandong Universi-ty of Technology (Social Science Edition), Issue 3,54-56

[3] Dong Kai.(2021)The risk of wrongful convictions in the leniency system for confession and punishment: a study of 206 wrongful convictions, Northern Law Journal,Issue 5,91-103.

[4] Xiao Peiquan.(2019)On the Standards of Proof for Cases of Admitting Guilty and Admitting Punishment, Law Journal, Issue 10,24-30.

[5] Yan Zhaohua, Li Yanfei.(2018)Voluntary Study on Confession and Punishment, Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law, Issue 2,87-97.

[6] Long Zongzhi.(2013)Painful Rules and Related Issues for Excluding Illegal Testimony in China", Political and Legal Forum, Issue 5,16-24

[7] Du Lei.(2020)On the Voluntary Judgment Standards for Confession and Punishment, Poli-tics and Law, Issue 6,148-160.

[8] Wang Haiyan.(2023)From the perspective of the leniency system of confession and pun-ishment, the 'trial centered' approach, China Law Journal, Issue 6,62-80.

[9] Jia Zhiqiang.(2022)Returning to Legal Norms: Reflections on the Application of the Crimi-nal Duty Lawyer System, Legal Research, Issue 1,120-134.

[10] Han Xu.(2021)Research on Effective Legal Assistance in Cases of Leniency for Admitting Guilty and Punishing, Law Journal, Issue 3,1-13+142.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-07

How to Cite

Study on the Prevention and Control of Wrongful Convictions in the Application of the Plea and Penalty Leniency System. (2025). Law and Humanities, 1(3), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.63313/LH.9024