Research on the Perfection of the System of Prohibiting Repeated Litigation in Civil Procedure

Authors

  • Zhen Shen Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233030, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/LH.9027

Keywords:

Prohibition of Repeated Litigation, Litigation Pendency, Object of Litigation, Judicial Safeguard

Abstract

The system of prohibiting repeated litigation plays a significant role in civil liti-gation, aiming to maintain judicial order, protect the rights and interests of par-ties, and improve litigation efficiency. Although China has stipulated the prohi-bition of repeated litigation in relevant judicial interpretations, it still faces many dilemmas in both theoretical and practical aspects. Through theoretical analysis of the system of prohibiting repeated litigation, this paper discusses its concept, origin, relationship with related concepts, and judicial value. Com-bined with the current situation of the system in China, it deeply analyzes the problems existing in legislative identification standards and judicial safeguard measures. Drawing on the experience of the two major foreign legal systems, it puts forward legislative improvement suggestions such as clarifying the scope of case subjects, improving the theory of the object of litigation, adopting the the-ory of litigation pendency, and supplementing the theory of issue preclusion. It also proposes directions for improving judicial safeguard measures, such as ac-celerating the establishment of a shared case-filing information network plat-form, supplementing guiding cases, and refining the judge's explanation system, so as to promote the continuous improvement of China's system of prohibiting repeated litigation.

References

[1] Chen Wei. Reconstruction of the Identification Standard for Repeated Litiga-tion [J]. Chi-nese and Foreign Law, 2020(06).

[2] Bao Bingfeng, Geng Huanfen. Interpretation of the Theory of Litigation Pen-dency in Civil Procedure of the Continental Law System [J]. Research on Civil Procedure Law, 2011(01).

[3] Yan Renqun. New Progress in the Objective Scope of Res Judicata [J]. Chinese and Foreign Law, 2017(02).

[4] Lou Zhengqian. The Theory and Application of the Principle of "Non bis in Idem" in Civil Trial [J]. Journal of Jiangsu Police College, 2011(02).

[5] Zhang Weiping. Frontier Theoretical Issues of Civil Procedure Law [J]. Journal of the Na-tional Procurators College, 2006(05).

[6] Gu Peidong. A Brief Discussion on Litigation Economy [J]. Modern Law Science, 1987(03).

[7] Weng Xiaobin. On the Protection of Procedural Interests [J]. Nanjing Univer-sity Law Re-view, 2010(02).

[8] Xiao Jianhua. Seeking an Independent Litigation Subject Status - Re-cognition of the Con-cept of Parties [J]. Modern Law Science, 2000(02).

[9] Ren Zhong. On the Relationship between the Object of Civil Litigation and the Litigation Request in China [J]. China Law, 2021(02).

Downloads

Published

2025-07-07

How to Cite

Research on the Perfection of the System of Prohibiting Repeated Litigation in Civil Procedure. (2025). Law and Humanities, 1(3), 72-78. https://doi.org/10.63313/LH.9027