A Study on the Disputes over Arctic Shipping Routes under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

Xinru Meng

doi:10.63313/LH.9029

Authors

Xinru Meng Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233030, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/LH.9029

Keywords:

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Arctic Shipping Routes, Mari-time Rights and Interests

Abstract

The geopolitical game between the United States and Russia in the Arctic ship-ping routes has led to a security crisis in the region, and the 2022 Ukraine crisis has further exacerbated the risk of conflict there. The United Nations Conven-tion on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) system has issues such as different inter-pretations and applications regarding the innocent passage of warships in terri-torial seas, the legal status of Arctic shipping routes, and navigation rights. In the geopolitical game in the European Arctic, major powers may exploit these international law rules to take military actions and achieve political goals, in-creasing the risk of armed conflicts. However, the existing regional cooperation system is insufficient to mitigate such security risks. In addition, the Ukraine crisis has caused geopolitics to dominate regional international relations, which not only increases security risks but also raises the attention of relevant coun-tries to international law. In the future, international laws such as UNCLOS may become important tools for maintaining peace and stability in the Arctic ship-ping routes.

References

[1] A. Donat Pharand, Innocent Passage in the Arctic, 6 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 3-60 (1968).

[2] Gao Fei, Wang Zhibin. Analysis of the Dispute over Navigation Freedom in the Arctic Northeast Passage between Russia and the United States and China's Response [J]. Siberian Studies, 2021, 48 (05):41-59.

[3] Jin Yongming. On the System of Innocent Passage in Territorial Seas [J]. Chinese Review of International Law, 2016(02):60-70.

[4] He Yongjie. The Principle of Freedom of Navigation: From Hegemonic Politics to Interna-tional Rule of Law [J]. International Review, 2022(01):76-103.

[5] Todorov A. Dire straits of the Russian Arctic: Options and challenges for a potential US FONOP in the Northern Sea Route [J]. Marine Policy, 2022, (139):1-8.

[6] Wang Zelin. A Study on the Peaceful Settlement of Navigation Disputes in Arctic Shipping Routes [J]. Wuhan University International Law Review, 2022, 6(03):1-22. DOI:10.13871/j.cnki.whuilr.2022.03.001.

[7] Jia Bingbing: A Study on the Dispute Settlement Mechanism of the United Nations Conven-tion on the Law of the Sea: Practice of Arbitration under Annex VII, Tsinghua University Press, 2018, p. 61.

[8] Gao Jianjun: A Study on the Dispute Settlement Mechanism of the United Nations Conven-tion on the Law of the Sea, China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2014, pp. 155-156.