Research on the Development Status of Export Tax Rebate Fraud Policy

Authors

  • Zhixuan Wu Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233030, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/LH.9032

Keywords:

Export tax rebate fraud, policy, current situation, issues, countermeasures

Abstract

Export tax rebate policies hold a key position in international trade and are an important means for the state to support foreign trade. Export tax rebate fraud involves criminals exploiting national export tax rebate policies to illegally obtain refund funds through fraudulent means. This behavior not only disrupts the national taxation system but may also disturb market balance, affecting fair market competition and economic stability. Currently, academic research on export tax rebate fraud is relatively scarce. Therefore, this paper focuses on the behavior of export tax rebate fraud by reviewing national policies, legal documents, and case analyses. It summarizes several issues in China's legal handling of export tax rebate fraud, including insufficient legal basis, inadequate punishment measures, and the need for further refinement of work processes. The article then proposes a series of improvement measures, such as strengthening legal support, increasing punishment severity, and optimizing work processes, to form a comprehensive prevention and control system that includes 'pre-event warning, in-process verification, and post-event tracing.' The aim is to provide references for the formulation and implementation of relevant policies to reduce instances of export tax rebate fraud and protect national interests and market order.

References

[1] Ministry of Finance and General Administration of Customs on specific regulations for lev-ying or refunding product taxes or value-added taxes on import and export products [J]. China Taxation, 1985, (06): 42-43.

[2] Chen Jianfeng and Yang Xi. Judicial determination of "fake self-operation, real agency" fraud to obtain export tax rebates [J]. China Procurator, 2022, (14):72-75.

[3] Wang Xiaodong. Several ways of fraud using export tax rebate policy and preventive measures [J]. Foreign Trade Practice, 2014, (03):62-64.

[4] Wang Peifen. Difficulties and Misconceptions in Judicial Recognition of the Crime of De-ceiving Export Tax Rebates —— Taking the Case of Su Mouxin and Wei Moufu Deceiving Export Tax Rebates as an Example [J]. Economic Criminal Law, 2024, (00):217-231.

[5] Zhanmei Li. Research on the Crime of Deceiving Export Tax Rebates [D]. China University of Political Science and Law, 2008.

[6] Zhao Liyun. The imminent cancellation of export tax rebates accelerates restructuring in the copper and aluminum processing industry [N]. Securities Times, 2024-11-27 (A03). DOI:10.38329/n.cnki.nzjsb.2024.005025.

[7] Lan Yisheng. Some Thoughts on China's Export Tax Rebate Policy [J]. Financial Expo, 2023, (12):18-19.

[8] Du Li and Chen Fengmei. Whether the Export Rebate Policy Needs to be Adjusted [J]. China Reform, 2022, (04):33-36.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-14

How to Cite

Research on the Development Status of Export Tax Rebate Fraud Policy. (2025). Law and Humanities, 1(3), 112-122. https://doi.org/10.63313/LH.9032