Empirical Challenges and Normative Path Reconstruction of the "Conspicuous Notice Obligation" of Standard Terms under the Civil Code
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63313/LH.9004Keywords:
Civil Code, standard terms, conspicuous notice obligation, typological governanceAbstract
Article 496 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China establishes the obligation of conspicuous notice for providers of standard terms, aiming to ad-dress unfair transactions caused by information asymmetry and unequal bar-gaining positions in contractual relationships. However, in judicial practice, the understanding and application of "conspicuous notice" are highly uncertain. Notice forms are often formalistic, and the effectiveness of notice is difficult to assess, leading to inconsistent judicial standards and undermining the certainty and predictability of the law. Based on empirical analysis of typical judicial cas-es, this paper reveals the main difficulties in applying the obligation of conspic-uous notice and, drawing on foreign legislative and theoretical achievements, proposes a typological approach to reconstructing notice standards. It seeks to balance contractual freedom and protection of the vulnerable, providing refer-ences for improving the relevant system and judicial practice.
References
[1] Wang Tianfan. Commentary on Article 496 of the Civil Code (Definition of Standard Terms and Obligations of Users) [J]. Journal of Nanjing University (Philosophy, Humanities, Social Sciences), 2020,57(06):49-65+158.
[2] Kong Xingru, Liu Qiuyue. Legal Inquiry on the Duty to Prompt for Standard Terms in Online Service Contracts [J]. Modern Communication, 2020, (11):59-60+58.
[3] Huang Shuai. The Private Law Protection of Substantive Contractual Freedom as a Basic Right Content —— Taking the Content Review of Standard Terms in Article 497 of the Civil Code as an Example [J]. Human Rights Studies (Journal), 2023,27(02):28-51+350-351.
[4] Liu Haojie. Improvement of the Rules on Standard Terms in Insurance Law: Taking the Civil Code as a Reference [J]. Law of Trade University, 2022,7 (00):199-207.
[5] Qu Jialu. Study on the Jurisdictional Standard Terms of Online Consumption Agreements [J]. China Market Regulation Research, 2022, (03):21-25.
[6] An Jincheng. Typological Construction and the Determination of Standard for Format Clause Prompting [J]. Journal of Social Sciences of Jilin University, 2021,61(03):86-95+234-235.
[7] Wang Tianfan. Commentary on Article 496 of the Civil Code (Definition of Standard Terms and Obligations of Users) [J]. Journal of Nanjing University (Philosophy, Humanities, Social Sciences), 2020,57(06):49-65+158.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by author(s) and Erytis Publishing Limited.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.