On the Prohibition of Evidence Illegally Obtained by Private Parties
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63313/LH.9005Keywords:
Private Evidence Collection, Illegally Obtained Evidence, Exclusionary Rule, Balancing of Legal InterestsAbstract
This article explores the issue of excluding evidence obtained by private individuals through illegal means in criminal proceedings in mainland China. Although the Criminal Procedure Law establishes provisions for evidence collection by judicial authorities and the exclusion of illegally obtained evidence, it does not explicit-ly address the legality or admissibility of evidence collected by private individuals. In practice, private evidence collection often infringes on the legal rights of the individuals involved, creating challenges for judicial authorities when handling such evidence. This paper proposes the introduction of the “balancing of legal inter-ests” theory, which suggests determining the admissibility of evidence based on the extent to which the evidence collection infringes upon the rights of the individu-al and balancing the pursuit of truth with procedural justice in the case. Through this mechanism, the paper aims to provide clear guiding principles for judicial prac-tice, safeguard legal rights, and ensure fairness and efficiency in the judicial process.
References
[1] Zhou, Y. (2019). A study on the admissibility of illegally obtained evidence by pri-vate par-ties in criminal procedure. Journal of Henan Radio & TV University,China, 32(3).
[2] Zhu, Y. (2019). On the validity of illegally obtained evidence by private parties in criminal procedure: From the perspective of the exclusionary rule. Journal of Henan Institute of Engineering (Social Sciences Edition), China, 34(2).
[3] Ai, M. (2018). The construction of legal theory on the prohibition of using illegal-ly ob-tained evidence by private parties in Chinese criminal procedure. Journal of Sichuan Uni-versity (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), China, 6.
[4] Wang, B. (2016). On the admissibility of illegally obtained evidence by private parties in criminal procedure. Hebei Law Science, China, 34(2).
[5] Ruan, J. (2015). The legal effect of illegally obtained evidence by private parties in criminal procedure. Times Law Journal,China, 13(2).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by author(s) and Erytis Publishing Limited.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.