The Practical Predicament and Improvement Path of The Two-Way Connection Mechanism Between Administrative and Criminal Law Enforcement In Our Country
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63313/LH.9040Keywords:
Transition between execution and punishment, Two-way connection, Case transfer, Procuratorial supervision, Evidence conversion, Rule of law governanceAbstract
The connection between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice is the core institutional design of the hierarchical governance of illegal and criminal activities and the closed-loop pursuit of legal responsibility in China, and it carries the important functions of solving the chaos of "substituting punishment for punishment" and "no punishment, no punishment" and maintaining the unity of the rule of law. With the revision and implementation of the Administrative Penalty Law in 2021, China officially established the two-way transfer system of administrative and criminal penalties, completing the institutional transformation from one-way positive transfer to two-way closed-loop connection. Subsequent supporting normative documents have been continuously refined, further consolidating the institutional foundation. However, in the current practical operation, there are still practical problems such as ambiguous substantive recognition standards, numerous procedural connection barriers, insufficient rigidity of supervision and restraint, and weak departmental synergy efficiency, which restrict the full release of the system's value. Based on the core content and normative system of the connection between administrative and criminal law enforcement, this paper sorts out the development context of the system, analyzes the practical bottlenecks and pain points, and proposes targeted improvement countermeasures for standardization, proceduralization and systematization to help build a two-way connection mechanism between administrative and criminal law enforcement that is full-chain, highly efficient and strongly supervised, and to enhance the level of legalization and refinement of social governance.
References
[1] Zhou Youyong, Liu Yanhong. On the Application of Administrative Penalties and Criminal Penalties [J]. Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law,1997(02):88-91+96.
[2] Chen Xingliang. On the Relationship between Administrative Penalties and Criminal Penalties [J]. Chinese Law,1992(04):25-32.
[3] Liu Yanhong, Zhou Youyong. General Theory of Administrative Criminal Law [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press,2008.
[4] Xie Zhidong. Theoretical Research on Several Issues in the Connection Mechanism between Administrative law enforcement and Criminal Justice [J]. Zhejiang Social Sciences,2011(04):54-59+66.
[5] Jin Chengbo. Institutional Construction of Reverse Connection of Execution [J]. Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 25,62(01):153-162.
[6] Ma Chunxiao. On the Reverse Connection between Administrative Offense and Execution [J]. Oriental Law,2025(03):127-142.
[7] Shi Jinghai, Li Xin. The dilemma and solution of the connection between Administrative and Criminal law enforcement in crimes of infringing upon citizens' personal information [J]. Journal of Social Sciences of Jilin University,2023,63(05):102-112+191-192.
[8] Supreme People's Procuratorate. Guidelines for the Work of the People's Procuratorate on the Reverse Connection of Administrative Punishment [Z].2024.
[9] Administrative Penalty Law of the People's Republic of China (Revised in 2021)[Z].
[10] Provisions on the Transfer of Suspected Criminal Cases by Administrative Law Enforcement Agencies [Z]. State Council,2001.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by author(s) and Erytis Publishing Limited.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







