Exploring the Realistic Dilemmas in China's Online Court Hearing Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63313/LH.9042Keywords:
Online court proceedings, judicial informatization, litigation efficiency, judicial transparency, information securityAbstract
As a product of the deep integration of information and network technology with judicial proceedings, online court hearings offer significant advantages in enhancing litigation efficiency, reducing litigation costs, and facilitating party participation. However, given that online court hearings in China are still in their early stages of development, they face numerous practical challenges in implementation. This paper systematically examines the core concepts, characteristics, and value of online court hearings, focusing on the major issues in areas such as legal provision, platform development, judicial transparency and privacy protection, and information system security. Based on this analysis, the paper proposes that efforts should be made to promote the standardized and systematic development of the online court hearing system by improving relevant legal regulations, establishing a unified online litigation platform, enhancing the transparency of court proceedings, and strengthening security measures.
References
[1] Yu Zhong. Wu Jingxiong and Ma Xiwu: Symbols of Two Modern Chinese Legal Traditions [J]. Law and Business Research, 2007, (01): 134-139.
[2] Zuo Weimin. Online Litigation in China: Empirical Research and Development Prospects [J]. Comparative Law Studies, 2020, (04): 161-172.
[3] Li Jingwei. Improvement of Civil Electronic Litigation System under the Background of Normalized Epidemic Prevention and Control [J]. Legal Application, 2021, (05): 149-155.
[4] Xie Dengke. The Chinese Model and Future Development of Online Litigation [J]. Chinese Applied Jurisprudence, 2022, (04): 151-166.
[5] Chen Yuefeng. Cooperative Governance of Critical Information Infrastructure Protection [J]. Chinese Journal of Law, 2018, 40(06): 175-193.
[6] Liao Yuanxun. Application of Network Video in Remote Adjudication [J]. China Trial, 2008, (10): 68-70.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by author(s) and Erytis Publishing Limited.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







