Maximizing Learning Potential: Strategies for Making Full Use of Optimal Input in the Teaching of Writings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63313/LLCS.9010Keywords:
Writing Instruction, Optimal Input, Problem SolutionsAbstract
Writing, as a multifaceted cognitive activity, is integral to education for its role in knowledge dissemination, critical analysis, and personal development. De-spite its significance, teaching writing presents various challenges, from linguis-tic limitations to difficulties in structuring thoughts coherently. The concept of ‘optimal input’, originally developed by Krashen for second language acquisi-tion, posits that comprehensible, engaging, and adequate written examples are key to language mastery. This paper extends this theory to writing instruction, advocating for captivating, relevant, and understandable models to foster writ-ing proficiency. Effective writing instruction promotes reflective thinking and strategic decision-making, transforming raw knowledge into organized dis-course. By exploring the roles of comprehensibility, relevance, and quantity of input, alongside fostering reflective practices, this study aims to construct a ro-bust framework for writing instruction. Addressing common pitfalls like insuffi-cient guidance, inadequate feedback, over-reliance on technology, and fixed mindsets, the paper suggests strategies for making full use of optimal input such as scaffolding, peer review, and growth mindset cultivation. These methods aim to enhance students’ writing abilities and their overall learning potential.
References
[1] Bean C. J. (2002). Engaging ideas: The Professor's Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. New York: Jossey-Bass.
[2] Bereiter C., & Scardamalia M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[3] Blackwell S. L., Trzesniewski H. K., & Dweck S. C. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an interven-tion. Child Development, 78(1), 246-263.
[4] Cummins J. (1984). Bilingualism and Special Education: Issues in Assessment and Peda-gogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
[5] Dweck S. C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books.
[6] Ellis R. (2005). Principles of Instructed Language Learning. System, 33(2), 207-228.
[7] Flower L, & Hayes R. J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387.
[8] Hyland K., & Hyland F. (2006). Feedback on Second Language Students’ Writing. Language Teaching Research, 10(2), 191-207.
[9] Krashen D. S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.
[10] Nation I. S. P., & Waring R. (1997). Vocabulary Size, Text Coverage, and Word Lists. Lan-guage Teaching Research, 1(1), 85-104.
[11] Swales M. J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[12] Wood D., Bruner S. J., & Ross G. (1976). The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by author(s) and Erytis Publishing Limited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
