A Diachronic Study of Sexism in English: Exploring the Impact of the Feminist Movement on Gendered Language
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63313/LLCS.9073Keywords:
sexism, English, feminist movement, gendered languageAbstract
This paper conducts a diachronic study of sexism in the English language, ex-ploring how the feminist movement has influenced and transformed gendered linguistic practices over time. By examining the historical evolution of sexism in English, the study highlights the various ways in which language has perpetuated gender biases, including the markedness of female-related words, semantic pe-joration, and asymmetrical word choices and collocations. The paper also delves into the feminist movement’s efforts to challenge and reform these linguistic practices, from the introduction of gender-neutral terms and titles to the crea-tion of new pronouns. Despite significant resistance, feminist linguistic reforms have made considerable strides in promoting gender equality in language. The study concludes that these reforms have not only addressed inherent sexism but have also opened up new possibilities for thinking about gender and identity, contributing to a more inclusive and equitable society.
References
[1] Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45-79.
[2] Spender, D. (1985). Man Made Language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
[3] Gold, D. L. (1984). Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary. Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America, 6(1), 200-235.
[4] Hornby, A. S. (1989). Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English. Oxford University Press.
[5] Parks, J. B., & Roberton, M. A. (2000). Development and validation of an instrument to measure attitudes toward sexist/nonsexist language. Sex Roles, 42, 415-438.
[6] Thorne, B., Henley, N., & Martyna, W. (1975). Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1(311).
[7] Ni, Z. (2005). A Historical Review and Contemporary Development of Feminist Studies. Jiangxi Social Sciences (6), 135-141.
[8] Sun, S. (2004). Feminism. Foreign Literature (5), 48-56. doi:10.16430/j.cnki.fl.2004.05.012
[9] MacKay, D. G., & Fulkerson, D. C. (1979). On the comprehension and production of pro-nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(6), 661-673.
[10] Cameron, D. (1991). Feminism and Linguistic Theory. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan.
[11] Holmes, J. (2000). Ladies and gentlemen: Corpus analysis and linguistic sexism. In Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory (pp. 141-155). Brill.
[12] Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G. N., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (2021). Grammar of Spoken and Written English. John Benjamins.
[13] Dai, W. (1983). An Overview of Gender Differences in Speech. Journal of Foreign Lan-guages (Journal of Shanghai International Studies University) (6), 3-7.
[14] He, Z. (1979). From Western Women's Liberation Movement to Subject-Verb Agreement in English. Foreign Language Teaching and Research (3), 73-75.
[15] Mu, F., & Li, X. (1998). Gender Discrimination and Neutralization in English. Foreign Lan-guages and Their Teaching (5), 16-18.
[16] Graddol, D., Leith, D., & Swann, J. (Eds.). (1996). English: History, Diversity, and Change (Vol. 1). Psychology Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by author(s) and Erytis Publishing Limited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
