The Educational Reflection of Naughty Children’s Spirit of Play in the Mid-to-Late 20th Century - Taking Pipilu and Ramona as Examples

Authors

  • Jiajia Su Yangze University of School of Foreign Studies, Jingzhou 434000, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/LLCS.9096

Keywords:

naughty children, the spirit of play, children education

Abstract

This paper explores the fundamental differences in educational philosophies between China and the West during the mid-to-late 20th century through a comparative analysis of two classic literary figures: Pipilu from Yuanjie Zheng’s works and Ramona from Beverly Cleary’s writings. Adopting the perspective of naughty children’s spirit of play and grounded in the pedagogy of children’s lit-erature, the research indicates that during the mid-to-late 20th century,   Chi-nese education tended to cultivate individuals who conform to social norms through discipline and suppression. In contrast, Western education placed greater emphasis on nurturing well-rounded individuals through guidance, re-specting children’s innate nature and creativity. These differences are pro-foundly reflected in the establishment of educational objectives and the selec-tion of pedagogical methods in both contexts, revealing the influence of culture. This study provides a historical and cultural perspective for understanding the divergences in Chinese and Western educational concepts during the mid-to-late 20th century, offering insights for contemporary educational reform.

References

[1] Bird B, Danielson J, Sieruta P D. Wild things! Acts of mischief in children’s literature[M]. Candlewick Press, 2014

[2] Cleary, Beverly. Ramona the Pest[M]. New York: Morrow, 1968

[3] Cleary, Beverly. Ramona's World[M]. New York: Morrow, 1999

[4] Jie Z. Game Spirits in the American Youngsters Series—Take Harry Potter and The Hunger Games as Examples[J]. Sino-US English Teaching, 2016, 13(4): 302-307.

[5] Morris, Ms Rebecca, and Claudia Nelson, eds. Representing children in Chinese and US chil-dren's literature[M]. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2014.

[6] Ryall E, Maclean M, Russell W. The philosophy of play[M]. London: Routeldge, 2013.

[7] Schiller A A, Schiller D H B. Word play, language-games, and unfair labels in Beverly Cleary’s Ramona the Pest[J]. Philosophy in Children’s Literature, 2012: 175-190.

[8] Ma Ban. Game Spirit and Children’s China[M]. Qingdao: Qingdao Publishing House, 2017. (in Chinese)

[9] Haidong Ding. On the Game Spirit of Children[J]. Journal of Shandong Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2006, (01): 78-81. (in Chinese)

[10] Xuebin Li. Children’s Literature and Game Spirit[M]. Nanchang: 21st Century Publishing House, 2011. (in Chinese)

[11] Quangen Wang. The Main Trends of Modern Chinese Children’s Literature[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing Publishing House, 2000. (in Chinese)

[12] Yuanjie Zheng. Pipilu’s General Mobilization[M]. Nanchang: 21st Century Publishing House, 2008. (in Chinese).

Downloads

Published

2025-10-17

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Educational Reflection of Naughty Children’s Spirit of Play in the Mid-to-Late 20th Century - Taking Pipilu and Ramona as Examples. (2025). Literature, Language and Cultural Studies, 3(1), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.63313/LLCS.9096