Research on Risk Management of Highway Project under BOT Mode
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63313/AERpc.9023Keywords:
BOT model; motorway, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation risk evaluationAbstract
With the development of modern transport, highway construction is chang-ing day by day, the total mileage of China's highways has jumped to the first in the world, highway has become an important part of transport infrastructure construc-tion. Accompanied by the increase in demand for high-quality highway construc-tion, highway construction projects to improve the level of risk management is imperative. In the fast-changing transport technology today, the number, scale, quality, frequency and environmental conditions of highway reconstruction and expansion projects are evolving rapidly, which puts forward new requirements for the risk control of highway reconstruction and expansion projects. To deeply explore the risk management of highway construction projects under BOT mode, this paper has sorted out the relevant concepts and theoretical foundations, and applied the Delphi method and other methods to identify and optimize the risk factors of highway projects under BOT mode. On this basis, the risk index system of highway projects under BOT mode is established after com-bining risk classification, and the risk evaluation system is established to facilitate the risk evaluation of the project. Finally, using the case study method, taking the ZL motorway project as an example, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method of AHP risk evaluation model can effectively carry out the comprehensive as-sessment and weight calculation of these factors, and carry out the systematic as-sessment and analysis of its risk. Based on the analysis results, relevant sugges-tions and countermeasures are proposed to reduce the risk of motorway construc-tion projects.This study provides certain reference and guidance for the risk management of highway construction projects under BOT mode, and provides useful experi-ence and inspiration for other similar projects.
References
[1] National Bureau of Statistics of China. China statistical yearbook [M]. Beijing: China Statis-tics Press, 2021.
[2] Liang Guo. Research on risk management of highway BOT project based on AHP and cloud model[J]. Value Engineering,2024,43(04):19-22.
[3] Yan Liu. Risk management research on BOT financing of engineering construction pro-jects[J]. Investment and Co-operation, 2023, (11):13-15.
[4] Zhen He, Chunlei Kan, Yuhang Zhao, Zhenxiao Lin, Feng Teng. Risk analysis and counter-measures research in the application of BOT mode[J]. Residence,2019, (19):155.
[5] Ahmadabadi A A, Heravi G. Risk assessment framework of PPP-megaprojects focusing on risk interaction and project success[J]. Transportation Research Part A,2019,124169-188.
[6] Assemi, B., Hickman, M., 2018. Relationship between heavy vehicle periodic inspections, crash contributing factors and crash severity. Transport. Res. Part A: Policy Pact. 113, 441–459.
[7] Chang, Z., Phang, S.-Y., 2017. Urban rail transit PPPs: Lessons from East Asian cities. Transport. Res. Part A: Policy Pact. 105, 106–122.
[8] Leguina, A., 2015. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Int. J. Res. Method Educ. 38 (2), 220–221.
[9] Boateng, P., Chen, Z., Ogunlana, S.O., 2015. An Analytical Network Process model for risks prioritization in megaprojects. Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (8), 1795–1811.
[10] Tavakolan, M., Etemadinia, H., 2017. Fuzzy Weighted interpretive structural modeling: improved method for identification of risk interactions in construction projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (11), 04017084.
[11] Alipour-Bashary M, Ravanshadnia M, Abbasianjahromi H, et al. A Hybrid Fuzzy Risk As-sessment Framework for Determining Building Demolition Safety Index[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering,2021,25(4):1-19.
[12] Ayesha S, Ming L. Project Schedule Acceleration Optimization Integrated with Energy Source–Based Assessment of Occupational Health and Safety Risks[J]. Journal of Construc-tion Engineering and Management,2023,149(12):
[13] Hossein M H, Meysam S M, Mohsen R. An optimization model for energy project scheduling problem with cost-risk-quality-social consideration trade-off under uncertainty: A re-al-world application[J]. Energy Strategy Reviews,2023,50
[14] Mortensen B N, Bjørndal K. The risk of facial nerve palsy after benign parotidectomy. A quality project. [J]. Acta oto-laryngologica,2024,1-5.
[15] Fernando V. Project Risk Costs: Estimation Overruns Caused When Using Only Expected Value for Contingency Calculations[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering,2022,38(5):
[16] Lim H B. PORTFOLIO SELECTION WITH HYPERBOLIC DISCOUNTING AND INFLATION RISK[J]. Journal of the Chungcheong Mathematical Society,2021,34.0(2.0):
[17] Herrera K E, Flannery A, Krimmer M. Risk and Resilience Analysis for Highway Assets[J]. Transportation Research Record,2017,2604(1):1-8.
[18] Rooksby H J. Weigh the legal, PR risks of your role in official versus unofficial speech[J]. Campus Legal Advisor,2018,18(8):1-3.
[19] Bhanushali S N, Belsare B N, Pattanaik R K B, et al. The Assessment of Awareness and Atti-tudes About the Use of Denture Adhesives Amongst Dental Practitioners in Northern Ma-harashtra: A Delphi Technique. [J]. Cureus,2024,16(1): e51833-e51833.
[20] Transportation Research - Transportation Policy; Recent Findings from S.O. Babatunde and Co-Researchers Yields New Information on Transportation Policy (Analysis of traffic revenue risk factors in BOT road projects in developing countries) [J]. Transportation Business Journal,2017,151-.
[21] Vahdatmanesh M, Firouzi A. Price risk management in BOT railroad construction projects using financial derivatives[J]. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construc-tion,2018,23(3):349-362.
[22] YANG T, LI Z, QIN J. AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of the safety risk in power in-vestment project along “the Belt and Road” [C]//. Proceedings of 2019 4th International Conference on Advances in Energy and Environment Research (ICAEER 2019). School of Economics Management, Shanghai University of Electric Power;2019:5.
[23] The SPSSAU project (2024). SPSSAU. (Version 24.0) [Online Application Software].
[24] WANG P, WANG W, MENG N, et al. multi-objective energy management system for DC mi-crogrids based on the maximum membership degree principle[J]. Journal of Modern Pow-er Systems and Clean Energy,2017,6(4):668-678.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by author(s) and Erytis Publishing Limited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
