Research on the Coupling Coordination of Digital Economy and High-Quality Agricultural Development in Hefei

Hongwei Chen

doi:10.63313/EBM.9110

Authors

Hongwei Chen School of Economics, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu, Anhui, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/EBM.9110

Abstract

Utilizing a series of statistical model methods and statistical data from Hefei for the period 2005-2023, this study analyzes the level of high-quality agricultural development, the development level of the digital economy, and the coupling coordination degree between the digital economy and high-quality agricultural development in Hefei. The results indicate that from 2005 to 2023, both the level of high-quality agricultural development and the development level of the digital economy in Hefei showed steady improvement, and the coupling coordination degree between the two systems continuously increased.

References

[1] Zhang, P. (2019). The Nature of the Digital Economy and Its Development Logic. Econo-mist, (2): 25-33.

[2] Li, X H. (2019). New Characteristics of the Digital Economy and the Formation Mechanism of New Drivers of Digital Economy. Reform, (11): 40-51.

[3] Han, Y Q. and Guo, Z W. (2022). Digital Economy Empowering Household Entrepreneur-ship: Theoretical Mechanism and Micro Evidence—Empirical Analysis Based on CFPS2018. Journal of Hubei University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 49(3): 170-179.

[4] Chen, X H., Li, Y Y. and Song, L J. (2022). Theoretical System and Research Prospects of the Digital Economy. Management World, 38(2): 208-224, 13-16.

[5] Liu, J., Yang, Y J. and Zhang, S F. (2020). Research on the Measurement and Driving Factors of China's Digital Economy. Shanghai Journal of Economics, (6): 81-96.

[6] Zhang, X L. and Jiao, Y X. (2017). A Preliminary Study on the Digital Economy Develop-ment Index and Its Application in China. Zhejiang Social Sciences, (4): 32-40, 157.

[7] Wan, X Y. and Luo, Y Q. (2022). Measurement of Digital Economy Development Level and Its Impact on Total Factor Productivity. Reform, (1): 101-118.