The Impact of Price Bundling Capability on Marketing Performance: The Mediating Role of Price Value Offering—A Case Study of Tasty Burger in Wuhan

Authors

  • Xingdong Hua The Batangas State University, Batangas City, 4200, Philippines Author
  • Irene H. Maralit The Batangas State University, Batangas City, 4200, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/EBM.9123

Keywords:

Price Bundling Capability, Price Value Offering, Marketing Performance, Fast-Food Industry, Mediating Effect, Consumer Perception

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between price bundling capability and marketing performance, with a focus on the mediating effect of price value offering in China’s fast-food industry. Taking Tasty Burger, a local chain in Wuhan, as the research object, a quantitative descriptive design was adopted. A structured questionnaire was distributed to 390 consumers across 151 outlets in 13 administrative districts of Wuhan. Data were analyzed using principal component analysis, mediation regression analysis, and structural equation modeling (SEM). Results show that Tasty Burger’s price bundling capability (encompassing Appeal, Value, and Choice dimensions) and price value offering (including Perceived Value and Purchase Loyalty) are highly recognized by consumers, with mean scores exceeding 6.0 on a 7-point scale. Marketing performance (Brand Awareness & Communication, Customer Loyalty & Engagement) also achieves a “Very Good” rating (mean = 6.33). SEM confirms that price value offering plays a significant partial mediating role in the relationship between price bundling capability and marketing performance (β = 0.587, p < 0.001). This study enriches the theoretical framework of pricing strategy and provides practical implications for fast-food enterprises to optimize bundle design, strengthen value communication, and enhance marketing performance.

References

[1] Babbie, E.R. (2016). The Practice of Social Research. 14th Edition, Cengage Learning, Bos-ton.

[2] Blut, M., Chaney, C., Lunardo, R., & Grewal, R. (2023). Customer Perceived Value: A Me-ta-Analysis of Its Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Marketing, 87(1), 1-24. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222429221138851

[3] Chen, Y., Rao, V.R., & Wang, Y. (2020). Pricing Strategies in the Fast-Food Industry: The Role of Bundling and Perceived Value. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102156. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102156

[4] Katsikeas, C.S., Leonidou, L.C., Morgan, N.A., & Hult, G.T.M. (2016). Marketing Performance Measurement: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sci-ence, 44(2), 177-195. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0439-8

[5] Liang, G., & Gao, L. (2020). Marketing Performance Measurement Systems and Firm Per-formance: The Mediating Role of Marketing Capabilities. Chinese Journal of Management, 17(5), 721-729. (In Chinese)

[6] Nguyen, T.T., Simkin, L., & Canh, N.T. (2022). The Impact of Bundling on Perceived Value and Purchase Intention in Quick-Service Restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 102, 103089. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103089

[7] Wang, C., Chen, Y., & Zhao, J. (2020). The Impact of Bundle Framing on Consumer Refer-ence Prices and Perceived Value. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(4), 419-430. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JCM-07-2019-3121

[8] Zhang, Y., & Li, J. (2021). Bundling Capability and Marketing Performance: The Mediating Role of Perceived Value. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 33(4), 987-1008. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/APJML-03-2020-0189

[9] Zeithaml, V.A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200301

Downloads

Published

2025-12-09

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Impact of Price Bundling Capability on Marketing Performance: The Mediating Role of Price Value Offering—A Case Study of Tasty Burger in Wuhan. (2025). Economics & Business Management, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.63313/EBM.9123