Data Factor Sharing and Digital Inclusive Finance: From the Perspective of Open Government Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63313/EBM.9171Keywords:
Open Government Data, Digital Inclusive Finance, Information Asymmetry, Financial Innovation, Data Factor Market, Inclusive GrowthAbstract
Against the backdrop of building a high-standard data factor market in China, digital inclusive finance has become a core engine for advancing inclusive economic growth, yet it faces a critical bottleneck in the transformation from "breadth coverage" to "in-depth services" rooted in long-standing information asymmetry and insufficient demand-side participation. This paper takes the opening of urban public data platforms in China as the analytical entry point, constructs a systematic theoretical framework to examine the impact of open government data (OGD) on the development of digital inclusive finance, and deconstructs its underlying transmission mechanisms. The theoretical analysis demonstrates that OGD, as a fundamental institutional innovation in the data factor market, can significantly promote the high-quality development of digital inclusive finance through two parallel core paths: reducing information error in the financial market and enabling financial technology innovation. Further theoretical exploration reveals the heterogeneous characteristics of OGD’s inclusive effect: its promoting role is more prominent in regions with sound market ecology, lower level of bank digital transformation, and higher degree of financial agglomeration. This paper breaks through the dominant supply-side research paradigm in digital inclusive finance, expands the theoretical research on the economic value of public data in the financial sector, and provides targeted policy references for building a data-driven inclusive financial system in China.
References
[1] Alan P, Alberto R R P: An Analysis of the Supply of Open Government Data, Future Internet, Vol. 12 (2020) No.11, p.186-186.
[2] Anthony A D, Huan T, Constantine Y: Measuring the Welfare Cost of Asymmetric Information in Consumer Credit Markets, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 146 (2022) No.3, p.821-840.
[3] Borusyak K, Jaravel X, Spiess J: Revisiting Event Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation, CEPR Discussion Paper, No.17247 (2022).
[4] Cengiz D, Dube A, Lindner A, Zipperer B: The Effect of Minimum Wages on Low-Wage Jobs, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 134 (2019) No.3, p.1405-1454.
[5] Demir A, Cela P V, Altunbas Y, et al: Fintech, Financial Inclusion and Income Inequality: A Quantile Regression Approach, European Journal of Finance, Vol. 28 (2020) No.1, p.1-22.
[6] Einav L, Levin J D: The Data Revolution and Economic Analysis, Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 14 (2014) No.1, p.1-24.
[7] Goldfarb A, Tucker C: Digital Economics, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 57 (2019) No.1, p.3-43.
[8] Goodman-Bacon A: Difference-in-Differences with Variation in Treatment Timing, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 225 (2021) No.2, p.254-277.
[9] Jones I C, Tonetti C: Nonrivalry and the Economics of Data, American Economic Review, Vol. 110 (2020) No.9, p.2819-2858.
[10] Kassen M: A Promising Phenomenon of Open Data: A Case Study of the Chicago Open Data Project, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 30 (2013) No.4, p.508-513.
[11] Li P, Lu Y, Wang J: Does Flattening Government Improve Economic Performance? Evidence from China, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 123 (2016), p.18-37.
[12] Park S, Ramon G: Open Data Innovation: Visualizations and Process Redesign as a Way to Bridge the Transparency-Accountability Gap, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 39 (2022) No.1, p.101456.
[13] Putnam D R, Leonardi R, Nanetti Y R: Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton University Press, USA 1994).
[14] Qian B, Tan Y, Power G, Mandal A: Economic Policy Uncertainty, Information Production, and Transparency, International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 103 (2025), p.103104.
[15] Veldkamp L, Chung C: Data and the Aggregate Economy, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 46 (2024) No.2, p.458-484.
[16] Vives X, Ye Z Q: Fintech Entry, Lending Market Competition, and Welfare, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 168 (2025), p.104040.
[17] Wang L L, Zhan Y: Does Cross-Policy Mix Work on Digital Innovation: Analyzing by the Impact of Open Government Data and Low-Carbon City Pilot Policies in China, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 491 (2025), p.114842.
[18] Wang R, Xu K C, Wu X: Open Government Data (OGD) as a Catalyst for Smart City Development: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Cities, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 41 (2024) No.4, p.101983.
[19] William L C, Danxia X, Longtian Z: Knowledge Accumulation, Privacy, and Growth in a Data Economy, Management Science, Vol. 67 (2021) No.10, p.6480-6492.
[20] Xu C G, et al: Open Government Data and Resource Allocation Efficiency: Evidence from China, Applied Economics, Vol. 57 (2025) No.22, p.2887-2904.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by author(s) and Erytis Publishing Limited.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







