Research on Strategies for Enhancing Manufacturers' Resilience Under Competition from E-Commerce Private Brands in the Smart Home Industry

Authors

  • Qing Long School of Economics and Management, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/EBM.9176

Keywords:

Smart home industry, E-commerce private brands, Manufacturer resilience, Supply chain resilience, Quality investment

Abstract

Against the backdrop of platform-based transformation in the smart home industry, growing competition from e-commerce private brands and frequent supply chain disruptions have put manufacturers in a dilemma between channel dependence, market competition, quality improvement, and resilience building. To fill the research gap that separates quality competition and supply chain resilience, this paper establishes a two-echelon supply chain game model with a budget constraint, integrating quality investment and resilience investment. Using backward induction, we derive the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium and conduct comparative static analysis. The results reveal a stable proportional relationship between resilience and quality investments, which shrinks under resource constraints, thus restraining quality input. Platform private brand pricing positively motivates manufacturers’ quality investment. Supply chain disruption risks affect platform pricing depending on resilience efficiency, while tight budgets push platforms to lower prices. Resource constraints reduce manufacturers’ profits. This study constructs a quality-resilience coordinated decision framework, reflects realistic resource limits, and deepens the understanding of platforms’ dual identity. It provides managerial insights for manufacturers’ resource allocation and strategic adjustment, and supports platforms in maintaining ecosystem health.

References

[1] MAO C. Analysis of the Advantages and Disadvantages of Ecosystem Chain Coupling: A Case Study of Xiaomi Smart Home:[C/OL]//Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on E-commerce and Modern Logistics. Singapore, Singapore: SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2025: 482-487[2026-03-12].

[2] Li, Geng, & Zhang. Research on Manufacturers’ Hardware Quality Decisions for Smart Devices Considering the Introduction of IoT Platform Private Brands [J/OL]. Industrial Economics Review, 2025, 16(2) [2026-03-12].

[3] KANG, LI. Digital-Driven New Quality Productivity and Its Impact on Supply Chain Resilience: A Complex Network Approach Integrating the Hadamard Product[J/OL]. Applied Sciences, 2025, 15(20)[2026-03-12].

[4] Dong, Cao, & Wu, X. Research on Collaborative Mechanisms and Upgrading Paths of Intelligent Product Ecosystems in Manufacturing [J/OL]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2023, 37(6) [2026-03-12].

[5] LIN, WANG, SAMARA , et al. Governance of corporate social responsibility: a platform ecosystem perspective[J/OL]. Management Decision, 2024, 62(12): 3782-3816.

[6] Yao, Liu, Ji, et al. Research Status and Prospects of Smart Home Design Oriented to Inclusiveness [J/OL]. Packaging Engineering, 2024, 45(6) [2026-03-12].

[7] Sheng, Wang, & Hu. Supply Chain Resilience: Adapting to Complexity—From the Perspective of Complex System Management [J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(11) [2026-03-12].

[8] Xu, & Gou. Boosting the Resilience of Industrial and Supply Chains Through Digital Transformation [J/OL]. Frontiers, 2023(24) [2026-03-12].

[9] Zhang, & Ma. How Intelligent Manufacturing Improves the Resilience of Industrial and Supply Chains: Theoretical Mechanism and Empirical Test [J/OL]. Economic Perspectives, 2024(11) [2026-03-12].

[10] CHRISANDINA N J, VEDANT S, IAKOVOU E, et al. Multi-scale integration for enhanced resilience of sustainable energy supply chains: Perspectives and challenges[J/OL]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2022, 164: 107891.

[11] SINGH G, RAJESH R, DAULTANI Y, et al. Resilience and sustainability enhancements in food supply chains using Digital Twin technology: A grey causal modelling (GCM) approach[J/OL]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2023, 179: 109172.

[12] YANG R, FENG L, ZHANG J, et al. Conflicts and cooperation: New product development or co-development in a supply chain[J/OL]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2025, 197: 104069.

[13] HEARNSHAW E J S, WILSON M M J. A complex network approach to supply chain network theory[J/OL]. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2013, 33(4): 442-469.

[14] DESJARDINE M, BANSAL P, YANG Y. Bouncing Back: Building Resilience Through Social and Environmental Practices in the Context of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis[J/OL]. Journal of Management, 2019, 45(4): 1434-1460.

[15] Pei, J. S., Chen, Z. A., Zhao, Y., et al. Industrial and Supply Chain Resilience: Concept Differentiation, Measurement Framework and Transmission Mechanism [J/OL]. Economic Perspectives, 2025(6) [2026-03-15].

[16] ALIKHANI R, RANJBAR A, TORABI S A, et al. Performance evaluation of concurrent supply chain resilience strategies[J/OL]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2025, 279: 109446.

[17] ALEM FONSECA M, TSOLAKIS N, KUMAR M. Trade-offs Unveiled: An Assessment of Supply Chain Resilience and Sustainability Cost[J/OL]. 2024[2026-03-15].

[18] DORMADY N C, ROSE A, ROA-HENRIQUEZ A, et al. The cost-effectiveness of economic resilience[J/OL]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2022, 244: 108371.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Research on Strategies for Enhancing Manufacturers’ Resilience Under Competition from E-Commerce Private Brands in the Smart Home Industry. (2026). Economics & Business Management, 5(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.63313/EBM.9176