A Review of the Theoretical Evolution and Research on Digital Technological Innovation in Enterprises

Ling Zhou

doi:10.63313/EBM.9207

Authors

Ling Zhou School of Economics and Management, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, Guangxi, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/EBM.9207

Keywords:

Digital technological innovation, Digital transformation, Innovation measurement, Economic consequences, digital governance

Abstract

Digital technology innovation in enterprises is the core endogenous driving force behind the digital transformation of the real economy and is fundamentally reshaping the underlying logic of global industrial division of labour and competition. Through a systematic review of key domestic and international literature spanning the past two decades, this paper clarifies the origins of three foundational theories underpinning digital technology innovation: the digital extension of Schumpeter’s classical theory of innovation, the theory of digital platform ecosystems, and the theory of the value of data as a factor of production.The scope of existing research has expanded from the application of individual information technology tools to a multi-stakeholder collaborative innovation network comprising ‘data, algorithms, computing power and application scenarios’. Within the empirical research framework, academia has established a three-dimensional measurement framework encompassing ‘technology investment, data governance and scenario implementation’; influencing factors have moved beyond the traditional dual dimensions of internal resources and external institutions in conventional technological innovation, incorporating new variables specific to digitalisation such as the marketisation of data as a factor of production, computing power infrastructure and competition within platform ecosystems;The economic consequences encompass transmission pathways at three levels: micro-level enterprises, meso-level industries, and the macroeconomy. Analysis reveals that whilst digital technological innovation drives improvements in total factor productivity, business model iteration and industrial structure upgrading, it also gives rise to governance challenges such as ambiguous data property rights, algorithmic ethical distortions and digital monopolies.Future research should strengthen interdisciplinary integration across management, law and computer science, and focus on conducting localised studies tailored to China’s emerging market institutional context and the characteristics of domestic platform enterprises.

References

[1] Acemoglu D, Akcigit U, Kerr W R. Innovation, reallocation and growth[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2020, 135(1): 1–82.

[2] Aghion P, Jones C I, Jones B F, et al. Artificial intelligence and economic growth [R]. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2020.

[3] Baldwin C Y, Clark K B. The architecture of participation: Does code openness matter? [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2000, 78(5): 136–145.

[4] Bloom N, Genakos C, Sadun R, et al. Management practices across firms and countries [J]. The American Economic Review, 2012, 102(1): 160–165.

[5] Brynjolfsson E, Smith M A. Frictionless commerce? A comparison of internet and conventional retailers[J]. The American Economic Review, 2000, 90(2): 410–415.

[6] Cappelli P. Why do firms differ in their use of employment practices?[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2008, 86(4): 112–119.

[7] Chesbrough H. Open innovation 2.0: extending the concept for the digital age[J]. Research-Technology Management, 2020, 63(4): 18–24.

[8] Davenport T H, Patil P. ‘Data scientist: The sexiest job of the 21st century’ [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2012, 90(10): 70–76.

[9] Deng Y, Jiang J, Liang L, et al. The value of digital business: a cross-country analysis[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2023, 157: 103226.

[10] Gawer A, Cusumano M A. The sources of platform leadership: An empirical analysis of the internet software ecosystem[J]. Research Policy, 2014, 43(6): 1060–1073.

[11] Hofmann, E. The value of data: An economic perspective[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2017, 34(2): 359–373.

[12] Katz M L, Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility[J]. The American Economic Review, 1985, 75(3): 424–440.

[13] Koutroumpis P. The growth of the internet and its impact on the economy: The case of broadband[J]. Telecommunications Policy, 2009, 33(3): 151–160.

[14] Porter M E, Stern S. The digital economy: Where are we?[J]. Research Policy, 2001, 30(10): 1651–1652.

[15] Porter, M. E. ‘Competition in the age of ecosystems’ [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2020, 98(3): 142–150.

[16] Reitzig M. The dynamics of patent stock accumulation in the chemical process industries [J]. Research Policy, 2004, 33(3): 453–473.

[17] Uhl-Bien M, Graen G B, Scandura T A. Expanding the bandwidth of leadership theory: The case for metaleadership in complex organisations[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2022, 33(1): 101563.

[18] Wang R Y, Strong D M. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers[J]. Management Science, 1996, 42(1): 156–167.

[19] Willcocks L P, Lacity M C, Rottman J W, et al. Understanding the digital-ready organisation: A research-based framework[J]. Journal of Information Technology, 2019, 34(3): 225–245.

[20] Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K. The new organising logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2012, 36(1): 135–162.

[21] Zhao Y, He B, Li Y. Digital business models and firm performance: Evidence from China[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2022, 16(2): 205–220.

[22] Zott C, Amit R. The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(1): 1–26.