Reconstructing Comparative Advantage in International Trade in Services in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Trade-in-Tasks Perspective

Authors

  • Lihang Yu Foshan University, School of Economics, Foshan 528000, China Author
  • Shipin Yang Foshan University, School of Economics, Foshan 528000, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/EBM.9218

Keywords:

Generative Artificial Intelligence, International Trade in Services, Comparative Advantage, Trade in Tasks, Service Offshoring, Digital Trade

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence is changing international trade in services through the production of services itself. Unlike earlier digital technologies, which mainly reduced the costs of cross-border delivery and communication, generative artificial intelligence can intervene directly in tasks such as text production, coding, customer service, and professional knowledge processing, thereby changing task costs, the degree of standardization, and the division of labor between humans and machines. Drawing on comparative advantage theory, trade-in-tasks theory, and research on automation, this article develops a task-level analytical framework to examine how substitution, augmentation, and creation affect the tradability of service tasks and the boundary of offshoring. The analysis shows that artificial intelligence does not eliminate comparative advantage but changes the basis on which it is formed. Cost advantages that traditionally depended on wage differentials and general human capital are increasingly shaped jointly by task composition, human-machine complementarity, access to models and computing power, data, and organizational integration capabilities. Competition in services trade is therefore more likely to shift toward productivity adjusted for artificial intelligence. On this basis, the article introduces the concept of artificial intelligence-mediated comparative advantage to describe service-trade advantages jointly shaped by relative task productivity and cross-border tradability under artificial intelligence.

References

[1] Brandl, K., Jensen, P.D.Ø., Ström, P. and Jones, A. (2025) Characterizing International Services: An Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policy. Journal of International Business Policy, 8, 428-446.

https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-025-00229-3

[2] Gervais, A. and Jensen, J.B. (2019) The Tradability of Services: Geographic Concentration and Trade Costs. Journal of International Economics, 118, 331-350.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2019.03.003

[3] Grossman, G.M. and Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2008) Trading Tasks: A Simple Theory of Offshoring. American Economic Review, 98, 1978-1997.

https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.5.1978

[4] Baldwin, R. and Robert-Nicoud, F. (2014) Trade-in-Goods and Trade-in-Tasks: An Integrating Framework. Journal of International Economics, 92, 51-62.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.10.002

[5] Brandl, K. (2019) The Impact of Offshoring on Knowledge-Intensive Services: A Study of Activities in Service Production Processes. Global Strategy Journal, 9, 453-487.

https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1352

[6] Autor, D.H., Levy, F. and Murnane, R.J. (2003) The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1279-1333.

https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552801

[7] Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P. (2018) The Race between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares, and Employment. American Economic Review, 108, 1488-1542.

https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160696

[8] Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P. (2019) Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33, 3-30.

https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.2.3

[9] Felten, E., Raj, M. and Seamans, R. (2021) Occupational, Industry, and Geographic Exposure to Artificial Intelligence: A Novel Dataset and Its Potential Uses. Strategic Management Journal, 42, 2195-2217.

https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3286

[10] Noy, S. and Zhang, W. (2023) Experimental Evidence on the Productivity Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Science, 381, 187-192.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh2586

[11] Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D. and Raymond, L.R. (2025) Generative AI at Work. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 140, 889-942.

https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjae044

[12] Hui, X., Reshef, O. and Zhou, L. (2024) The Short-Term Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Employment: Evidence from an Online Labor Market. Organization Science, 35, 1977-1989.

https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.18441

[13] Brynjolfsson, E., Hui, X. and Liu, M. (2019) Does Machine Translation Affect International Trade? Evidence from a Large Digital Platform. Management Science, 65, 5449-5460.

https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3388

[14] Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D. and Syverson, C. (2021) The Productivity J-Curve: How Intangibles Complement General Purpose Technologies. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 13, 333-372.

https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20180386

Downloads

Published

2026-08-17

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Reconstructing Comparative Advantage in International Trade in Services in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Trade-in-Tasks Perspective. (2026). Economics & Business Management, 6(3), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.63313/EBM.9218