A Study on the Impact of Digital Transformation on Enterprise High-Quality Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63313/EBM.9220Keywords:
Cdigital Transformation, High-Quality Development, Total Factor Productivity, Internal Control, Information AsymmetryAbstract
Using A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2021 as samples, this paper employs fixed-effect models and instrumental variable approaches to examine the impact, mechanisms, and heterogeneity of digital transformation on high-quality development of enterprises. The findings indicate that digital transformation significantly promotes high-quality development, a conclusion that remains robust after a series of robustness and endogeneity tests. Mechanism analysis reveals that digital transformation empowers high-quality development through three channels: enhancing innovation, optimizing internal control, and alleviating information asymmetry. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the promotion effect is more pronounced in state-owned enterprises and manufacturing firms. This paper provides empirical evidence for enterprises to formulate differentiated digital strategies and offers policy implications for governments to improve digital financial systems and industrial support policies.
References
[1] Brynjolfsson E, Mitchell T, Rock D. What can machines learn and what does it mean for occupations and the economy?[J]. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 2018, 108:43-47.
[2] Ding C H, Liu C, Zheng C Y, Li F. Digital Economy, Technological Innovation and High-Quality Economic Development : Based on Spatial Effect and Mediation Effect[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 14(1).
[3] Li T H, Wen J Y, Zeng D W, Liu K. Has enterprise digital transformation improved the efficiency of enterprise technological innovation? A case study on Chinese listed companies, Mathematical Biosciences and engineering, 2022, 19(12):12632-12654.
[4] Li X T. An evolutionary game‐theoretic analysis of enterprise information security investment based on information sharing platform[J]. Managerial and Decision Economics, 2021, 43(3):595-606.
[5] Li Y, Yang X D, Ran Q Y, Wu H T, Irfan M, Ahmad M. Energy structure, digital economy, and carbon emissions:evidence from China[J]. Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021, 28(45):64606-64629.
[6] Suila G K, Erol G, Tadeusz C, et al. Modelling of the Energy Depletion Process and Battery Depletion Attacks for Battery-Powered Internet of Things (IoT) Devices[J]. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023, 23(13).
[7] VialG.Understandingdigitaltransformation:Areviewandaresearchagenda[J]. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2019, 28(2):118-144.
[8] Wan Z, Li J, Duan W, Chen Y C, Xiong N X. Lightweight and universal intelligent service platform in indoor environment[J]. Cluster Computing:The Journal of Networks, Software Tools and Applications, 2019, 22(3) : S9187-S9198.
[9] Wiredu, G O. Organizing Digital Platforms and Customer Needs for Digital Service Innovation. African Journal of Information Systems. 2023, 14(2): 137-164.
[10] Xie H J, Wen J Y, Wang X H. Digital Finance and High-Quality Development of State-Owned Enterprises—A Financing Constraints Perspective[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(22).
[11] Zhou W Y. Enterprise Management Resource Protection System Based on Digital Information Technology[J]. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by author(s) and Erytis Publishing Limited
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
