Scaffolding Pragmatic Listening with Gricean Maxims in Junior Middle School EFL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63313/ESW.9174Keywords:
Conversational Implicature, Cooperative Principle, Pragmatic Inference, Listening Instruction, Junior Middle School EFLAbstract
Listening comprehension in junior middle school English classrooms is often treated as the recognition of sounds, words, and literal sentence meanings. Such an approach, however, may not sufficiently equip learners to infer speakers’ intentions when utterances are indirect, exaggerated, incomplete, or apparently irrelevant. Drawing on Grice’s Cooperative Principle, this pedagogical article illustrates how the four conversational maxims (Quality, Quantity, Relation, and Manner) can be integrated into junior middle school listening instruction. Based on classroom observation records, teacher-student interaction excerpts, and listening tasks, this analysis shows how teacher-guided questioning, contextual reasoning, repeated listening, attention to intonation, and cultural explanation can help learners move from literal decoding to pragmatic inference. The article argues that conversational implicature theory is most useful when it is transformed into short, age-appropriate inferential procedures rather than presented as abstract linguistic knowledge. A teachable four-step inferential sequence is proposed: (1) identify the literal meaning, (2) notice the unusual feature, (3) connect with context and tone, and (4) infer the communicative intention. The article concludes with practical implications for classroom practice and suggestions for teachers who wish to incorporate pragmatic inference into their listening lessons.
References
[1] Corsetti, C. R. (2014). Strategy-based listening and pragmatic comprehension. BELT-Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal, 5(1), 4–14.
[2] Gao, H. (2011). Implications of conversational implicature theory for conversational listening and listening teaching. Heihe Journal, (8), 92–93.
[3] Geng, X., & Meng, Y. (2025). Enhancing Chinese EFL learners’ listening inferential ability through dynamic assessment. SAGE Open, 15(2).
[4] Gilakjani, A. P., & Ahmadi, M. R. (2011). A study of factors affecting EFL learners’ English listening comprehension and the strategies for improvement. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 977–988.
[5] Gong, W. (2008). Application of conversational implicature theory to English listening teaching. Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Engineering, 28(1), 89–92.
[6] Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
[7] Li, Q. (2014). Gricean conversational implicature theory and its implications for English listening teaching. Journal of Hainan Radio and Television University, 2(2), 407–410.
[8] Taguchi, N. (2024). Listening and pragmatics. Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Listening , 174–187. Taylor and Francis.
[9] Lu, Y. (2012). On the teaching of English listening. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(2), 407–410.
[10] Nguyen, M. T. T., & Pham, T. T. T. (2022). Instructional effects on L2 pragmatic comprehension: The case of indirect refusals and indirect opinions. Language Learning Journal, 50(4), 427–442.
[11] Putri, T. A., Sitorus, S., Yunita, D., Siregar, S., Aulia, D. N., Zahra, N. A., Parinduri, A. I., Lubis, D. N. A., Wardiah, D., & others. (2024). A systematic review of pragmatic competence in second language acquisition. Sintaksis: Publikasi Para Ahli Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris, 11(3), 423–443.
[12] Ravari, R. K., & Rashidi, N. (2024). Interlanguage pragmatic learning strategies (IPLS) as predictors of Iranian EFL learners’ comprehension of conversational implicature: Structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Asia TEFL, 21(1), 139–160.
[13] Taguchi, N. (2005). Comprehending implied meaning in English as a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 89(4), 543–562.
[14] Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1–50.
[15] Wang, H. (2011). Conversational implicature in English listening comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 1162–1167.
[16] Wang, S. (2005). The teaching and deduction of conversational implicature in listening comprehension [Master’s thesis, Anhui University].
[17] Yang, D. (2003). On Grice’s theory of conversational implicature. Foreign Language Teaching, 24(1), 11–15.
[18] Yang, L. (2010). The implications of conversational meaning for listening teaching. Overseas English, (1), 38–39.
[19] Yang, L., & Zhang, D. (2004). Conversational implicature and listening comprehension teaching. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, (1), 64–66.
[20] Yeldham, M. (2023). Approaches to second language listening instruction: Investigating the ‘top-down/bottom-up’ debate. Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(3), 805–805.
[21] Zheng, S. (2016). Conversational implicature theory and implicit problems in listening tests. Journal of Liaoning Radio and Television University, (2), 36–67.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by author(s) and Erytis Publishing Limited
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
