Low-Carbon Restructuring of Core Course Content in Civil Engineering Education Under the Dual Carbon Strategy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63313/ESW.9121Keywords:
Carbon Peaking, Carbon Neutrality, Civil Engineering, Curriculum Reform, Low-Carbon RestructuringAbstract
Driven by the overarching imperatives of the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality strategy, the low-carbon transformation of the construction industry has imposed fundamentally new requirements on civil engineering talent development. Yet the structural misalignment between the prevailing curriculum and the competency demands of the industry's low-carbon transition has emerged as the central bottleneck constraining the quality of professional training. Grounded in the Outcome-Based Education (OBE) philosophy as its methodological foundation—and guided by the core principles of demand-driven curricula, competency-centered pedagogy, and iterative content renewal—this study proposes systematic reform schemes for four representative core courses: Civil Engineering Materials, Civil Engineering Construction Technology, Civil Engineering and Environmental Protection, and Concrete Structural Design. Each scheme encompasses the restructuring of instructional content through targeted additions and deletions, the upgrading of laboratory components, and the renewal of practical case studies. The findings provide an operationally viable reference pathway for implementing low-carbon education reform at the course level in civil engineering programs under the dual carbon imperative.
References
[1] China Association of Building Energy Efficiency, Chongqing University. 2024 Research Report on Carbon Emissions in China's Urban and Rural Construction Sector[R]. Beijing: China Association of Building Energy Efficiency, 2025.
[2] Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. Action Plan for Strengthening the Development of a Higher Education Talent Development System for Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality[Z]. 2022-04-19.
[3] LI Z Y, ZHU H, LIU Z J, et al. Guiding the reform of higher engineering education with result-oriented educational ideas [J]. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2014(2): 29-34+70.
[4] ZENG G, LI Z, WANG Y Y, et al. Teaching reform practice of civil engineering materials course based on the concept of science and education collaboration[J]. Journal of Architectural Education in Institutions of Higher Learning, 2022, 31(6): 146-152.
[5] XIAO J Z, DENG Q, XIA B. Evolution and prospects of low-carbon concrete preparation [J]. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2022, 39(5): 1-12.
[6] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Assessment Standard for Green Building: GB/T 50378—2019[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2019.
[7] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Standard for Calculating Building Carbon Emissions: GB/T 51366-2019[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2019.
[8] Chongqing Jiaotong University. School of Civil Engineering Hosts Frontier Micro-Lecture on Civil Engineering Case Analysis: Research and Application of the Mechanical Behavior of Prefabricated Steel-Concrete Composite Structures[EB/OL]. [2025-05-26]. http://civil.cqjtu.edu.cn/info/1219/12559.htm
[9] ZHANG M, WEN F A, LIU J B. Discussion on logic of constructing virtual simulation learning environment in colleges and universities [J]. Experimental Technology and Management, 2023, 40(3): 1-6.
[10] AI X Y, PAN Z D, LI J, et al. Exploration and practice of online teaching of civil engineering construction course based on OBE engineering education model[J]. Journal of Higher Education, 2022, 8(07): 106-109.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by author(s) and Erytis Publishing Limited.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







