Exploring the Commonalities and Distinctiveness between Chinese Fine Brushwork Flower and Bird Paintings and European Oil Paintings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63313/LLCS.9119Keywords:
China, Europe, Fine Brushwork Painting, Flower-and-Bird Painting, Oil Painting, CommonalitiesAbstract
This study investigates the intersection and divergence between Chinese fine brushwork flower-and-bird paintings (gongbi hua) and European oil paintings, focusing on their representation of nature and symbolic communication. It examines shared thematic elements and aesthetic principles, such as the pursuit of harmony and beauty, while acknowledging distinct approaches shaped by differing cultural contexts. The research employs a comparative analysis methodology, scrutinizing composition, perspective, and material application in both traditions. Findings reveal that while both art forms explore similar subject matter, their execution and underlying philosophies diverge significantly. Chinese paintings emphasize meticulous detail and symbolic representation, whereas European oil paintings prioritize realism and the exploration of light and shadow. The analysis further explores how cultural values influence artistic choices, shaping the interpretation and appreciation of these art forms. The study contributes to a deeper understanding of cross-cultural artistic expression and provides insights into the diverse ways in which humans perceive and represent the natural world. It highlights the importance of considering both universal artistic concerns and culturally specific techniques in art historical analysis.
References
[1] Barnett, V. G., & Hoopes, T. (1995). Painters of Shanghai: Escape from the mundane. Oxford University Press.
[2] Gombrich, E. H. (2018). The story of art. Phaidon Press.
[3] Sullivan, M. (1962). Chinese art in the twentieth century. University of California Press.
[4] Barnett, R. W., & Ho, W. K. (1988). Eight Dynasties of Chinese Painting: The Collections of the Nelson Gallery-Atkins Museum, Kansas City, and The Cleveland Museum of Art. Cleveland Museum of Art.
[5] Gombrich, E. H. (1995). The Story of Art. Phaidon.
[6] Sullivan, M. (1989). The Art of China. University of California Press.
[7] Bath, V. C. (2015). Peonies: The Imperial Flower. Tuttle Publishing.
[8] Cooper, J. C. (1992). Symbolic and Mythological Animals. Aquarian Press.
[9] de Givry, G. (1971). Witchcraft, Magic & Alchemy. Courier Dover Publications.
[10] Ferguson, G. (1961). Signs and Symbols in Christian Art. Oxford University Press.
[11] Rewald, J. (1973). The History of Impressionism. Museum of Modern Art.
[12] Armstrong, L. (1958). Shakespeare's imagination: A study of the psychology of association and inspiration. University of Nebraska Press.
[13] Cheung, G. K. (2009). Phoenix reborn: The art and culture of the qing dynasty. Art Gallery of Greater Victoria.
[14] Ferguson, G. (1961). Signs and symbols in Christian art. Oxford University Press.
[15] Fong, M. H. (2015). Art as history, history as art: Calligraphy and painting as evidence. University of Washington Press.
[16] Li, H., & Smith, P. (2005). Chinese painting: Selections from the permanent collection. Yale University Press.
[17] Yang, X. (2010). Chinese mythology: An introduction. New World Press.
[18] Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. University of California Press.
[19] Livio, M. (2002). The Golden Ratio: The Story of Phi, the World's Most Astonishing Number. Broadway Books.
[20] Sullivan, M. (1974). The Arts of China. University of California Press.
[21] Wittkower, R. (1998). Art and Architecture in Italy, 1600-1750. Yale University Press.
[22] Arnheim, R. (2004). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. University of California Press.
[23] Hamilton, J. (2009). Turner. Tate Publishing.
[24] Munro, T. (2016). Oriental aesthetics. Dover Publications.
[25] Sullivan, M. (1989). The arts of China. University of California Press.
[26] Alpers, S. (1988). Rembrandt's enterprise: The studio and the market. University of Chicago Press.
[27] Barnhart, R. M. (1997). Three thousand years of Chinese painting. Yale University Press.
[28] Gombrich, E. H. (2016). The story of art. Phaidon Press.
[29] Hay, J. (2010). Chinese painting. Yale University Press.
[30] Sullivan, M. (1999). The arts of China. University of California Press.
[31] Barnard, N. (2005). Chinese Art: Painting, Calligraphy, Bronze, Jade, Ceramics. Parkstone International.
[32] Bomford, D., Dunkerton, J., Foister, S., Kirby, J., Pilc, N., & Roy, A. (1989). Art in the Making: Italian Painting Before 1400. National Gallery Publications.
[33] Clunas, C. (1997). Art in China. Oxford University Press.
[34] Hayashi, R. (2010). The History of Japanese Art. Tuttle Publishing.
[35] Phenix, A. (2013). The Science of Paintings. Springer.
[36] Alpers, S. (1983). The art of describing: Dutch art in the seventeenth century. University of Chicago Press.
[37] Friedländer, M. J. (1965). Early Netherlandish painting. Praeger.
[38] Munro, T. (1989). Oriental aesthetics. Dover Publications.
[39] Sullivan, M. (1962). The birth of landscape painting in China. University of California Press.
[40] Kemp, M. (1990). The science of art: Optical themes in western art from Brunelleschi to Seurat. Yale University Press.
[41] Munro, T. (1989). Oriental aesthetics. Greenwood Press.
[42] Panofsky, E. (1991). Perspective as symbolic form. Zone Books.
[43] Eliade, M. (1959). The sacred and the profane: The nature of religion. Harcourt, Brace & World.
[44] Ito, J. (2010). Resonance: New essays on the intersection of music and architecture. Errant Bodies Press.
[45] Sullivan, M. (1961). Chinese landscape painting, Vol. 7. University of California Press.
[46] Dissanayake, E. (1992). Homo aestheticus: Where art comes from and why. Free Press.
[47] Iwabuchi, K. (2002). Recentering globalization: Popular culture and Japanese transnationalism. Duke University Press.
[48] Kempers, A. J. B. (1992). Ageless Borobudur. Dharma Bhakti.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by author(s) and Erytis Publishing Limited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
